|
Message-ID: <2236FBA76BA1254E88B949DDB74E612B41BDAC98@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 07:23:55 +0000 From: "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com> To: David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> CC: "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com> Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 01/13] Add architecture independent hardened atomic base >I start to believe that we have a mismatch of terms here. >Strictly speaking underflow is not defined for non-floating point numbers, so since we are dealing here with ints and longs, when both of them approach zero and then wrap around, it is treated as overflow (just in a different direction than when it approaches LONG_MAX or LONG_MIN). Correction: " when both of them approach INT_MIN and LONG_MIN (I am constantly making this mistake when explaining this, my brain doesn't like signed integers) and then wrap around ".
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.