[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2236FBA76BA1254E88B949DDB74E612B41BDABAE@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 06:28:53 +0000
From: "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
CC: "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com"
<kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>,
Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 03/13] kernel: identify wrapping atomic usage
On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com> wrote:
> From: David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>
>While these patches are all doing the same mechanic changes, I think they should still have a commit message body. Maybe something simple
>like:
>Switch wrapping atomic_t uses in $subsystem to atomic_t_wrap in support of CONFIG_HARDENED_ATOMIC.
Oh, they actually did all have the same text, but this one slipped though the latest changes. Will fix.
Best Regards,
Elena.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
