|
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jKg6zCd4wwmx974+m2fW3biMoD1He52C0b9UmwsSUfnCQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 14:13:10 -0700 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com> Cc: "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>, Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/13] kernel: identify wrapping atomic usage On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com> wrote: > From: David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com> > > Signed-off-by: Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com> > Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com> > Signed-off-by: David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com> While these patches are all doing the same mechanic changes, I think they should still have a commit message body. Maybe something simple like: Switch wrapping atomic_t uses in $subsystem to atomic_t_wrap in support of CONFIG_HARDENED_ATOMIC. -Kees -- Kees Cook Nexus Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.