[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160914205425.GA15021@davidb.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:54:25 -0600
From: David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>
To: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] arm64: Privileged Access Never
using TTBR0_EL1 switching
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 06:46:30PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>This is the third version of the arm64 PAN emulation using TTBR0_EL1
>switching. The series has not yet included the alternative nop patches
>from Mark Rutland, nor the empty_zero_page from Ard B. This will be done
>in a subsequent version once 4.9-rc1 is out (which will include Mark's
>alternative nop patches).
I've tested these with a bunch of reboots in both qemu and HiKey and
have not seen the efi failure.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
