|
Message-ID: <1471393569.4075.187.camel@perches.com> Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:26:09 -0700 From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>, Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>, Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] bug: Provide toggle for BUG on data corruption On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 17:20 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > The kernel checks for cases of data structure corruption under some > CONFIGs (e.g. CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST). When corruption is detected, some > systems may want to BUG() immediately instead of letting the system run > with known corruption. Usually these kinds of manipulation primitives can > be used by security flaws to gain arbitrary memory write control. This > provides a new config CONFIG_BUG_ON_DATA_CORRUPTION and a corresponding > macro CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION for handling these situations. Notably, even > if not BUGing, the kernel should not continue processing the corrupted > structure. [] > diff --git a/include/linux/bug.h b/include/linux/bug.h [] > @@ -118,4 +118,21 @@ static inline enum bug_trap_type report_bug(unsigned long bug_addr, > } > > #endif /* CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG */ > + > +/* > + * Since detected data corruption should stop operation on the affected > + * structures, this returns false if the corruption condition is found. > + */ > +#define CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(condition, format...) \ My preference would be to use (condition, fmt, ...) > + do { \ > + if (unlikely(condition)) { \ > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BUG_ON_DATA_CORRUPTION)) { \ > + printk(KERN_ERR format); \ and pr_err(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); so that any use would also get any local pr_fmt applied as well. > + BUG(); \ > + } else \ > + WARN(1, format); \ > + return false; \ > + } \ > + } while (0) > + > #endif /* _LINUX_BUG_H */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.