[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2760702.46Rp2Juk5b@wuerfel>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 21:41:23 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>, linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm: apply more __ro_after_init
On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 11:32:07 AM CEST Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 2:43 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 11:40:24AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> @@ -1309,16 +1309,11 @@ void __init arm_mm_memblock_reserve(void)
> >> * Any other function or debugging method which may touch any device _will_
> >> * crash the kernel.
> >> */
> >> +static char vectors[PAGE_SIZE * 2] __ro_after_init __aligned(PAGE_SIZE);
> >> static void __init devicemaps_init(const struct machine_desc *mdesc)
> >> {
> >> struct map_desc map;
> >> unsigned long addr;
> >> - void *vectors;
> >> -
> >> - /*
> >> - * Allocate the vector page early.
> >> - */
> >> - vectors = early_alloc(PAGE_SIZE * 2);
> >
> > This one is not appropriate. We _do_ write to these pages after init
> > for FIQ handler updates. See set_fiq_handler().
>
> Ah, interesting. I guess none of that hardware is being tested on
> linux-next.
Right. The OMAP1 Amstrad Delta is a somewhat obscure machine, and that
would be the most likely candidate to run into this.
RiscPC also has FIQ support, but I have not heard of anyone other
than Russell still using one with a modern kernel, and I doubt he
tests linux-next on it.
The s3c24xx and imx machines that could use FIQ probably don't
use it in practice, last time I checked, I didn't see any DTS file
or platform data definition in the kernel that activated that
code path.
> I'll drop that chunk and resubmit.
Good enough for now, but it may be worth revisiting this, as the
vector page might be a good target for an attack if you have a
way to overwrite a few bytes in the kernel.
Note that there are two mappings for the pages, and as Russell
mentioned, the TLS emulation writes to the other one that is
at a fixed virtual address.
It might be better to start by making the fixed mapping readonly,
as KASLR doesn't protect that one at all, and change the TLS
code accordingly.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
