|
Message-ID: <2213000.eZV9GAcFWG@vostro.rjw.lan> Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2016 03:03:26 +0200 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net> To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/power/64: Support unaligned addresses for temporary mapping On Wednesday, August 03, 2016 11:28:48 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote: > > From: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com> > > > > Correctly setup the temporary mapping for hibernation. Previous > > implementation assumed the offset between KVA and PA was aligned on the PGD level. > > With KASLR memory randomization enabled, the offset is randomized on the PUD > > level. This change supports unaligned up to PMD. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com> > > [yinghai: change loop to virtual address] > > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> > > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com> On a second thought, it seems to be better to follow your suggestion to simply provide a special version of kernel_ident_mapping_init() for hibernation, because it is sufficiently distinct from the other users of the code in ident_map.c. The patch below does just that (lightly tested). Thomas, can you please test this one too? Thanks, Rafael --- From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com> Subject: [PATCH] x86/power/64: Always create temporary identity mapping correctly The low-level resume-from-hibernation code on x86-64 uses kernel_ident_mapping_init() to create the temoprary identity mapping, but that function assumes that the offset between kernel virtual addresses and physical addresses is aligned on the PGD level. However, with a randomized identity mapping base, it may be aligned on the PUD level and if that happens, the temporary identity mapping created by set_up_temporary_mappings() will not reflect the actual kernel identity mapping and the image restoration will fail as a result (leading to a kernel panic most of the time). To fix this problem, provide simplified routines for creating the temporary identity mapping during resume from hibernation on x86-64 that support unaligned offsets between KVA and PA up to the PMD level. Although kernel_ident_mapping_init() might be made work in that case too, using hibernation-specific code for that is way simpler. Reported-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com> Suggested-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com> --- arch/x86/power/hibernate_64.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) Index: linux-pm/arch/x86/power/hibernate_64.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/arch/x86/power/hibernate_64.c +++ linux-pm/arch/x86/power/hibernate_64.c @@ -77,18 +77,63 @@ static int set_up_temporary_text_mapping return 0; } -static void *alloc_pgt_page(void *context) +static void ident_pmd_init(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end) { - return (void *)get_safe_page(GFP_ATOMIC); + for (; addr < end; addr += PMD_SIZE) + set_pmd(pmd + pmd_index(addr), + __pmd((addr - __PAGE_OFFSET) | __PAGE_KERNEL_LARGE_EXEC)); +} + +static int ident_pud_init(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end) +{ + unsigned long next; + + for (; addr < end; addr = next) { + pmd_t *pmd; + + pmd = (pmd_t *)get_safe_page(GFP_ATOMIC); + if (!pmd) + return -ENOMEM; + + next = (addr & PUD_MASK) + PUD_SIZE; + if (next > end) + next = end; + + ident_pmd_init(pmd, addr & PMD_MASK, next); + set_pud(pud + pud_index(addr), __pud(__pa(pmd) | _KERNPG_TABLE)); + } + return 0; +} + +static int ident_mapping_init(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long mstart, unsigned long mend) +{ + unsigned long addr = mstart + __PAGE_OFFSET; + unsigned long end = mend + __PAGE_OFFSET; + unsigned long next; + + for (; addr < end; addr = next) { + pud_t *pud; + int result; + + pud = (pud_t *)get_safe_page(GFP_ATOMIC); + if (!pud) + return -ENOMEM; + + next = (addr & PGDIR_MASK) + PGDIR_SIZE; + if (next > end) + next = end; + + result = ident_pud_init(pud, addr, next); + if (result) + return result; + + set_pgd(pgd + pgd_index(addr), __pgd(__pa(pud) | _KERNPG_TABLE)); + } + return 0; } static int set_up_temporary_mappings(void) { - struct x86_mapping_info info = { - .alloc_pgt_page = alloc_pgt_page, - .pmd_flag = __PAGE_KERNEL_LARGE_EXEC, - .kernel_mapping = true, - }; unsigned long mstart, mend; pgd_t *pgd; int result; @@ -108,7 +153,7 @@ static int set_up_temporary_mappings(voi mstart = pfn_mapped[i].start << PAGE_SHIFT; mend = pfn_mapped[i].end << PAGE_SHIFT; - result = kernel_ident_mapping_init(&info, pgd, mstart, mend); + result = ident_mapping_init(pgd, mstart, mend); if (result) return result; }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.