|
Message-Id: <1469046427-12696-3-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 13:26:57 -0700 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Laura Abbott <labbott@...oraproject.org>, Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>, Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>, PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>, Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, x86@...nel.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v4 02/12] mm: Implement stack frame object validation This creates per-architecture function arch_within_stack_frames() that should validate if a given object is contained by a kernel stack frame. Initial implementation is on x86. This is based on code from PaX. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> --- arch/Kconfig | 9 ++++++++ arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 + arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/thread_info.h | 9 ++++++++ 4 files changed, 63 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig index d794384a0404..5e2776562035 100644 --- a/arch/Kconfig +++ b/arch/Kconfig @@ -424,6 +424,15 @@ config CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG endchoice +config HAVE_ARCH_WITHIN_STACK_FRAMES + bool + help + An architecture should select this if it can walk the kernel stack + frames to determine if an object is part of either the arguments + or local variables (i.e. that it excludes saved return addresses, + and similar) by implementing an inline arch_within_stack_frames(), + which is used by CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY. + config HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING bool help diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig index 0a7b885964ba..4407f596b72c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ config X86 select HAVE_ARCH_SOFT_DIRTY if X86_64 select HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK select HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE + select HAVE_ARCH_WITHIN_STACK_FRAMES select HAVE_EBPF_JIT if X86_64 select HAVE_CC_STACKPROTECTOR select HAVE_CMPXCHG_DOUBLE diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h index 30c133ac05cd..ab386f1336f2 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h @@ -180,6 +180,50 @@ static inline unsigned long current_stack_pointer(void) return sp; } +/* + * Walks up the stack frames to make sure that the specified object is + * entirely contained by a single stack frame. + * + * Returns: + * 1 if within a frame + * -1 if placed across a frame boundary (or outside stack) + * 0 unable to determine (no frame pointers, etc) + */ +static inline int arch_within_stack_frames(const void * const stack, + const void * const stackend, + const void *obj, unsigned long len) +{ +#if defined(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER) + const void *frame = NULL; + const void *oldframe; + + oldframe = __builtin_frame_address(1); + if (oldframe) + frame = __builtin_frame_address(2); + /* + * low ----------------------------------------------> high + * [saved bp][saved ip][args][local vars][saved bp][saved ip] + * ^----------------^ + * allow copies only within here + */ + while (stack <= frame && frame < stackend) { + /* + * If obj + len extends past the last frame, this + * check won't pass and the next frame will be 0, + * causing us to bail out and correctly report + * the copy as invalid. + */ + if (obj + len <= frame) + return obj >= oldframe + 2 * sizeof(void *) ? 1 : -1; + oldframe = frame; + frame = *(const void * const *)frame; + } + return -1; +#else + return 0; +#endif +} + #else /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */ #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 diff --git a/include/linux/thread_info.h b/include/linux/thread_info.h index b4c2a485b28a..3d5c80b4391d 100644 --- a/include/linux/thread_info.h +++ b/include/linux/thread_info.h @@ -146,6 +146,15 @@ static inline bool test_and_clear_restore_sigmask(void) #error "no set_restore_sigmask() provided and default one won't work" #endif +#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_WITHIN_STACK_FRAMES +static inline int arch_within_stack_frames(const void * const stack, + const void * const stackend, + const void *obj, unsigned long len) +{ + return 0; +} +#endif + #endif /* __KERNEL__ */ #endif /* _LINUX_THREAD_INFO_H */ -- 2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.