[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <dac83682fc628d52e8a9167bd17215ba7914bac7.1468270393.git.luto@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 13:53:42 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 09/32] x86/dumpstack: When OOPSing, rewind the stack before do_exit()
If we call do_exit() with a clean stack, we greatly reduce the risk of
recursive oopses due to stack overflow in do_exit, and we allow
do_exit to work even if we OOPS from an IST stack. The latter gives
us a much better chance of surviving long enough after we detect a
stack overflow to write out our logs.
Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
---
arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S | 11 +++++++++++
arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 11 +++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c | 10 +++++++++-
3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
index 983e5d3a0d27..0b56666e6039 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
@@ -1153,3 +1153,14 @@ ENTRY(async_page_fault)
jmp error_code
END(async_page_fault)
#endif
+
+ENTRY(rewind_stack_do_exit)
+ /* Prevent any naive code from trying to unwind to our caller. */
+ xorl %ebp, %ebp
+
+ movl PER_CPU_VAR(cpu_current_top_of_stack), %esi
+ leal -TOP_OF_KERNEL_STACK_PADDING-PTREGS_SIZE(%esi), %esp
+
+ call do_exit
+1: jmp 1b
+END(rewind_stack_do_exit)
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
index 9ee0da1807ed..b846875aeea6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
@@ -1423,3 +1423,14 @@ ENTRY(ignore_sysret)
mov $-ENOSYS, %eax
sysret
END(ignore_sysret)
+
+ENTRY(rewind_stack_do_exit)
+ /* Prevent any naive code from trying to unwind to our caller. */
+ xorl %ebp, %ebp
+
+ movq PER_CPU_VAR(cpu_current_top_of_stack), %rax
+ leaq -TOP_OF_KERNEL_STACK_PADDING-PTREGS_SIZE(%rax), %rsp
+
+ call do_exit
+1: jmp 1b
+END(rewind_stack_do_exit)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
index ef8017ca5ba9..4eefee06f6fd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
@@ -226,6 +226,8 @@ unsigned long oops_begin(void)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(oops_begin);
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(oops_begin);
+void __noreturn rewind_stack_do_exit(int signr);
+
void oops_end(unsigned long flags, struct pt_regs *regs, int signr)
{
if (regs && kexec_should_crash(current))
@@ -247,7 +249,13 @@ void oops_end(unsigned long flags, struct pt_regs *regs, int signr)
panic("Fatal exception in interrupt");
if (panic_on_oops)
panic("Fatal exception");
- do_exit(signr);
+
+ /*
+ * We're not going to return, but we might be on an IST stack or
+ * have very little stack space left. Rewind the stack and kill
+ * the task.
+ */
+ rewind_stack_do_exit(signr);
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(oops_end);
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
