|
Message-ID: <20160628075546.GA15690@gondor.apana.org.au> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:55:46 +0800 From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/29] rxrpc: Avoid using stack memory in SG lists in rxkad On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 08:52:20AM +0100, David Howells wrote: > Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote: > > > - skcipher_request_set_crypt(req, &sg[1], &sg[0], sizeof(tmpbuf), iv.x); > > + skcipher_request_set_crypt(req, &sg, &sg, sizeof(tmpbuf), iv.x); > > Don't the sg's have to be different? Aren't they both altered by the process > of reading/writing from them? No they don't have to be different. > > struct rxrpc_skb_priv *sp; > > ... > > + swap(tmpbuf.xl, *(__be64 *)sp); > > + > > + sg_init_one(&sg, sp, sizeof(tmpbuf)); > > ???? I assume you're assuming that the rxrpc_skb_priv struct contents can > arbitrarily replaced temporarily... Of course you can, it's per-skb state. > And using an XCHG-equivalent instruction? This won't work on a 32-bit arch > (apart from one that sports CMPXCHG8 or similar). No this is not using an atomic xchg, whatever gave you that idea? -- Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.