|
Message-Id: <20160628222956.8142716b310953fa6b1af1c4@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 22:29:56 +0200 From: Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com> To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>, pageexec@...email.hu, spender@...ecurity.net, mmarek@...e.com, keescook@...omium.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, minipli@...linux.so, linux@...linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@....com, david.brown@...aro.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org, tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jlayton@...chiereds.net, arnd@...db.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] Introduce the initify gcc plugin On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 21:02:54 +0200 Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk> wrote: > It'll get placed in multiple sections by the compiler, and nothing bad > happens. String deduplication is something the linker does to sections > equipped with appropriate flags. So in this case that of course means Note that I didn't add such flags to my sections yet, but I have it on my todo list. > that the kernel image itself would be slightly bigger, while the used > data after init would be the same. But I don't think there's a lot of > these cases. (Also, "initfunc" would at least vanish). -- Emese
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.