|
Message-ID: <32026.1467099166@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 08:32:46 +0100 From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/29] rxrpc: Avoid using stack memory in SG lists in rxkad Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote: > @@ -277,6 +277,7 @@ struct rxrpc_connection { > struct key *key; /* security for this connection (client) */ > struct key *server_key; /* security for this service */ > struct crypto_skcipher *cipher; /* encryption handle */ > + struct rxrpc_crypt csum_iv_head; /* leading block for csum_iv */ > struct rxrpc_crypt csum_iv; /* packet checksum base */ > unsigned long events; > #define RXRPC_CONN_CHALLENGE 0 /* send challenge packet */ NAK. This won't work. csum_iv_head is per packet being processed, but you've put it in rxrpc_connection which is shared amongst several creators/digestors of packets. Putting it in rxrpc_call won't work either since it's also needed for connection level packets. David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.