|
Message-Id: <1466556426-32664-1-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 17:46:57 -0700 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@...il.com>, Alexander Popov <alpopov@...ecurity.com>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>, Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>, Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com Subject: [PATCH v7 0/9] x86/mm: memory area address KASLR This is v7 of Thomas Garnier's KASLR for memory areas (physical memory mapping, vmalloc, vmemmap). It expects to be applied on top of the x86/boot tip. The current implementation of KASLR randomizes only the base address of the kernel and its modules. Research was published showing that static memory addresses can be found and used in exploits, effectively ignoring base address KASLR: The physical memory mapping holds most allocations from boot and heap allocators. Knowning the base address and physical memory size, an attacker can deduce the PDE virtual address for the vDSO memory page. This attack was demonstrated at CanSecWest 2016, in the "Getting Physical: Extreme Abuse of Intel Based Paged Systems" https://goo.gl/ANpWdV (see second part of the presentation). The exploits used against Linux worked successfuly against 4.6+ but fail with KASLR memory enabled (https://goo.gl/iTtXMJ). Similar research was done at Google leading to this patch proposal. Variants exists to overwrite /proc or /sys objects ACLs leading to elevation of privileges. These variants were tested against 4.6+. This set of patches randomizes the base address and padding of three major memory sections (physical memory mapping, vmalloc, and vmemmap). It mitigates exploits relying on predictable kernel addresses in these areas. This feature can be enabled with the CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY option. (This CONFIG, along with CONFIG_RANDOMIZE may be renamed in the future, but stands for now as other architectures continue to implement KASLR.) Padding for the memory hotplug support is managed by CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY_PHYSICAL_PADDING. The default value is 10 terabytes. The patches were tested on qemu & physical machines. Xen compatibility was also verified. Multiple reboots were used to verify entropy for each memory section. Notable problems that needed solving: - The three target memory sections need to not be at the same place across reboots. - The physical memory mapping can use a virtual address not aligned on the PGD page table. - Reasonable entropy is needed early at boot before get_random_bytes() is available. - Memory hotplug needs KASLR padding. Patches: - 1: refactor KASLR functions (moves them from boot/compressed/ into lib/) - 2: clarifies the variables used for physical mapping. - 3: PUD virtual address support for physical mapping. - 4: split out the trampoline PGD - 5: KASLR memory infrastructure code - 6: randomize base of physical mapping region - 7: randomize base of vmalloc region - 8: randomize base of vmemmap region - 9: provide memory hotplug padding support There is no measurable performance impact: - Kernbench shows almost no difference (-+ less than 1%). - Hackbench shows 0% difference on average (hackbench 90 repeated 10 times).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.