|
Message-ID: <CALCETrU4bcLyBJDVOPCW_MobQVGPiHRP+KfZMGu8YQJHnmjYeQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:21:26 -0700 From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...tuozzo.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/13] mm: Track NR_KERNEL_STACK in pages instead of number of stacks On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 4:10 AM, Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...tuozzo.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 05:28:26PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > ... >> @@ -225,7 +225,8 @@ static void account_kernel_stack(struct thread_info *ti, int account) >> { >> struct zone *zone = page_zone(virt_to_page(ti)); >> >> - mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_KERNEL_STACK, account); >> + mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_KERNEL_STACK, >> + THREAD_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE * account); > > It won't work if THREAD_SIZE < PAGE_SIZE. Is there an arch with such a > thread size, anyway? If no, we should probably drop thread_info_cache. On a quick grep, I can't find any. I'll add a BUILD_BUG_ON for now. --Andy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.