|
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLYYg8QdWy0nMLLV4e4=xz7G2U7CBQjsAd5Q5PfZd48ng@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:11:37 -0700 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" <ahferroin7@...il.com> Cc: Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>, Linux-Next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] gcc-plugins: disable under COMPILE_TEST On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@...il.com> wrote: > On 2016-06-12 20:18, Emese Revfy wrote: >> >> On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 15:25:39 -0700 >> Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote: >> >>> I don't like this because it means if someone specifically selects >>> some plugins in their .config, and the headers are missing, the kernel >>> will successfully compile. For many plugins, this results in a kernel >>> that lacks the requested security features, and that I really do not >>> want to have happening. I'm okay leaving these disabled for compile >>> tests for now. We can revisit this once more distros have plugins >>> enabled by default. >> >> >> You are right. Your patch is safer. >> > Why not make it so that if COMPILE_TEST is enabled, the build warns if it > can't find the headers, otherwise it fails? That way, people who are doing > all*config builds but don't have the headers will still get some build > coverage, and the people who are enabling it as a security feature will > still get build failures. I don't see a clear way to do this, but if you can find a way to make that happen, please send a patch! :) -Kees -- Kees Cook Chrome OS & Brillo Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.