[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jJTx3gzzXSNK5x+ui0x7kGhvrV8vhKVoc33T2W3h4T5XQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 14:26:56 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
Cc: "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] lkdtm: add function for testing .rodata section
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com> wrote:
>> On 06/07/2016 02:57 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>>
>>> This adds a function that lives in the .rodata section. The section
>>> flags are corrected using objcopy since there is no way with gcc to
>>> declare section flags in an architecture-agnostic way.
>>>
>>
>> Permit me to be the bearer of bad architecture news once again. With
>> arm64 cross compiler (both Fedora 6.1.1 and Linaro 5.1)
>>
>> CC drivers/misc/lkdtm_rodata.o
>> OBJCOPY drivers/misc/lkdtm_rodata_objcopy.o
>> LD drivers/misc/lkdtm.o
>> drivers/misc/lkdtm_rodata_objcopy.o: file not recognized: File format not
>> recognized
>> scripts/Makefile.build:423: recipe for target 'drivers/misc/lkdtm.o' failed
>> make[2]: *** [drivers/misc/lkdtm.o] Error 1
>> scripts/Makefile.build:440: recipe for target 'drivers/misc' failed
>> make[1]: *** [drivers/misc] Error 2
>> Makefile:985: recipe for target 'drivers' failed
>> make: *** [drivers] Error 2
>>
>>
>> As far as I can tell this is because arm64 defines OBJCOPYFLAGS and they get
>> propagated to objcopy
>>
>> aarch64-linux-gnu-objcopy -O binary -R .note -R .note.gnu.build-id -R
>> .comment
>> -S --set-section-flags .text=alloc,readonly
>> --rename-section .text=.rodata drivers/misc/lkdtm_rodata.o
>> drivers/misc/lkdtm_rodata_objcopy.o
>>
>> vs x86
>>
>> objcopy --set-section-flags .text=alloc,readonly --rename-section
>> .text=.rodata
>> drivers/misc/lkdtm_rodata.o drivers/misc/lkdtm_rodata_objcopy.o
>>
>>
>> specifically it's the -O binary that seems to break things, the same failure
>> happens on x86 as well with the the same commands. It works if I clear out
>> the OBJCOPYFLAGS variable first but I don't think that's the correct way to
>> fix this.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Laura
>>
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/misc/Makefile | 7 +++++++
>>> drivers/misc/lkdtm.h | 6 ++++++
>>> drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
>>> drivers/misc/lkdtm_rodata.c | 10 ++++++++++
>>> 4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/misc/lkdtm.h
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/misc/lkdtm_rodata.c
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/misc/Makefile b/drivers/misc/Makefile
>>> index c3cb6ad8cc37..b2d3d68dfa22 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/misc/Makefile
>>> +++ b/drivers/misc/Makefile
>>> @@ -59,3 +59,10 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CXL_BASE) += cxl/
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_PANEL) += panel.o
>>>
>>> lkdtm-$(CONFIG_LKDTM) += lkdtm_core.o
>>> +lkdtm-$(CONFIG_LKDTM) += lkdtm_rodata_objcopy.o
>>> +
If I add:
OBJCOPYFLAGS :=
here, it seems to fix things...
>>> +OBJCOPYFLAGS_lkdtm_rodata_objcopy.o := \
>>> + --set-section-flags .text=alloc,readonly \
>>> + --rename-section .text=.rodata
>>> +$(obj)/lkdtm_rodata_objcopy.o: $(obj)/lkdtm_rodata.o
>>> + $(call if_changed,objcopy)
>
> Uhhhh... How is arm64 injecting those extra flags? OBJCOPYFLAGS is
> being set with := here?
>
> In related news I need to figure out how to get my cross-compiler
> builds more well scripted...
>
> -Kees
>
> --
> Kees Cook
> Chrome OS & Brillo Security
--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS & Brillo Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
