Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160601124227.e922af8299168c09308d5e1b@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 12:42:27 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>
Cc: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, pageexec@...email.hu,
 spender@...ecurity.net, mmarek@...e.com, keescook@...omium.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com,
 linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 axboe@...nel.dk, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
 mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, bart.vanassche@...disk.com,
 davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] Add the latent_entropy gcc plugin

On Tue, 31 May 2016 01:31:45 +0200 Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com> wrote:

> This plugin mitigates the problem of the kernel having too little entropy during
> and after boot for generating crypto keys.
> 
> It creates a local variable in every marked function. The value of this variable is
> modified by randomly chosen operations (add, xor and rol) and
> random values (gcc generates them at compile time and the stack pointer at runtime).
> It depends on the control flow (e.g., loops, conditions).
> 
> Before the function returns the plugin writes this local variable
> into the latent_entropy global variable. The value of this global variable is
> added to the kernel entropy pool in do_one_initcall() and _do_fork().

I don't think I'm really understanding.  Won't this produce the same
value on each and every boot?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.