[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160518123327.9018f73af78a47b4456b2027@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 12:33:27 +0200
From: Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>
To: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@....ibm.com>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, pageexec@...email.hu, spender@...ecurity.net,
mmarek@...e.com, keescook@...omium.org, linux@...musvillemoes.dk,
fengguang.wu@...el.com, dvyukov@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
david.brown@...aro.org, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com, linuxppc-dev
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] GCC plugin infrastructure
> I've done some basic sanity testing on powerpc with the cyclomatic
> complexity plugin (with LE native + cross-compilers) and it seems to
> work with the patch below.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@....ibm.com>
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> index a18a0dc..0cfed5b 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ config PPC
> select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS if MPROFILE_KERNEL
> select HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACER
> select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
> + select HAVE_GCC_PLUGINS
> select SYSCTL_EXCEPTION_TRACE
> select ARCH_WANT_OPTIONAL_GPIOLIB
> select VIRT_TO_BUS if !PPC64
Hi,
Did you test the plugins with all gcc versions (4.5-6)?
--
Emese
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
