kernel-hardening - Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] x86/KASLR: Clarify identity map interface

Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160512083142.GB26457@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 10:31:42 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	Lasse Collin <lasse.collin@...aani.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
	"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] x86/KASLR: Clarify identity map interface


* Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:

> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:24 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > * Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> >> +/*
> >> + * Mapping information structure passed to kernel_ident_mapping_init().
> >> + * Due to relocation, pointers must be assigned at run time not build time.
> >> + */
> >> +static struct x86_mapping_info mapping_info = {
> >> +     .pmd_flag       = __PAGE_KERNEL_LARGE_EXEC,
> >> +};
> >
> >> +void initialize_identity_maps(void)
> >>  {
> >> +     /* Init mapping_info with run-time function/buffer pointers. */
> >> +     mapping_info.alloc_pgt_page = alloc_pgt_page;
> >> +     mapping_info.context = &pgt_data;
> >
> > Could you please outline the precise failure mode? What gets executed when, which
> > pointer gets relocated and which not, and exactly when does it pose a problem,
> > etc.
> 
> It's the issue described at the top of misc.c:
> 
> /*
>  * WARNING!!
>  * This code is compiled with -fPIC and it is relocated dynamically at
>  * run time, but no relocation processing is performed. This means that
>  * it is not safe to place pointers in static structures.
>  */

Btw., is there any way to detect such invalid pointers during build-time somehow? 
This is not the first such bug and I suspect it won't be the last one either.

Thanks,

	Ingo

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.