Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5j+ZCNy0JvHwJBC+Tni0hZ2whGfzwtzKw+HBg-NxHY7Yig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 11:53:39 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>
Cc: "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, 
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, 
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, 
	Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>, Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>, 
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>, 
	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>, Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@...il.com>, 
	Alexander Popov <alpopov@...ecurity.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, 
	Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, 
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>, 
	"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] x86, boot: Implement ASLR for kernel memory
 sections (x86_64)

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com> wrote:
> Randomizes the virtual address space of kernel memory sections (physical
> memory mapping, vmalloc & vmemmap) for x86_64. This security feature
> mitigates exploits relying on predictable kernel addresses. These
> addresses can be used to disclose the kernel modules base addresses or
> corrupt specific structures to elevate privileges bypassing the current
> implementation of KASLR. This feature can be enabled with the
> CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY option.

I'm struggling to come up with a more accurate name for this, since
it's a base randomization of the kernel memory sections. Everything
else seems needlessly long (CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE_MEMORY). I wonder if
things should be renamed generally to CONFIG_KASLR_BASE,
CONFIG_KASLR_MEMORY, etc, but that doesn't need to be part of this
series. Let's leave this as-is, and just make sure it's clear in the
Kconfig.

> The physical memory mapping holds most allocations from boot and heap
> allocators. Knowning the base address and physical memory size, an
> attacker can deduce the PDE virtual address for the vDSO memory page.
> This attack was demonstrated at CanSecWest 2016, in the "Getting
 Physical Extreme Abuse of Intel Based Paged Systems"
> https://goo.gl/ANpWdV (see second part of the presentation). The
> exploits used against Linux worked successfuly against 4.6+ but fail
> with KASLR memory enabled (https://goo.gl/iTtXMJ). Similar research
> was done at Google leading to this patch proposal. Variants exists to
> overwrite /proc or /sys objects ACLs leading to elevation of privileges.
> These variants were testeda against 4.6+.

Typo "tested".

>
> The vmalloc memory section contains the allocation made through the
> vmalloc api. The allocations are done sequentially to prevent
> fragmentation and each allocation address can easily be deduced
> especially from boot.
>
> The vmemmap section holds a representation of the physical
> memory (through a struct page array). An attacker could use this section
> to disclose the kernel memory layout (walking the page linked list).
>
> The order of each memory section is not changed. The feature looks at
> the available space for the sections based on different configuration
> options and randomizes the base and space between each. The size of the
> physical memory mapping is the available physical memory. No performance
> impact was detected while testing the feature.
>
> Entropy is generated using the KASLR early boot functions now shared in
> the lib directory (originally written by Kees Cook). Randomization is
> done on PGD & PUD page table levels to increase possible addresses. The
> physical memory mapping code was adapted to support PUD level virtual
> addresses. An additional low memory page is used to ensure each CPU can
> start with a PGD aligned virtual address (for realmode).
>
> x86/dump_pagetable was updated to correctly display each section.
>
> Updated documentation on x86_64 memory layout accordingly.
>
> Performance data:
>
> Kernbench shows almost no difference (-+ less than 1%):
>
> Before:
>
> Average Optimal load -j 12 Run (std deviation):
> Elapsed Time 102.63 (1.2695)
> User Time 1034.89 (1.18115)
> System Time 87.056 (0.456416)
> Percent CPU 1092.9 (13.892)
> Context Switches 199805 (3455.33)
> Sleeps 97907.8 (900.636)
>
> After:
>
> Average Optimal load -j 12 Run (std deviation):
> Elapsed Time 102.489 (1.10636)
> User Time 1034.86 (1.36053)
> System Time 87.764 (0.49345)
> Percent CPU 1095 (12.7715)
> Context Switches 199036 (4298.1)
> Sleeps 97681.6 (1031.11)
>
> Hackbench shows 0% difference on average (hackbench 90
> repeated 10 times):
>
> attemp,before,after
> 1,0.076,0.069
> 2,0.072,0.069
> 3,0.066,0.066
> 4,0.066,0.068
> 5,0.066,0.067
> 6,0.066,0.069
> 7,0.067,0.066
> 8,0.063,0.067
> 9,0.067,0.065
> 10,0.068,0.071
> average,0.0677,0.0677
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>
> ---
> Based on next-20160502
> ---
>  Documentation/x86/x86_64/mm.txt         |   4 +
>  arch/x86/Kconfig                        |  15 ++++
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kaslr.h            |  12 +++
>  arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h    |  11 ++-
>  arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h       |   1 +
>  arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64_types.h |  15 +++-
>  arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S               |   2 +-
>  arch/x86/kernel/setup.c                 |   3 +
>  arch/x86/mm/Makefile                    |   1 +
>  arch/x86/mm/dump_pagetables.c           |  11 ++-
>  arch/x86/mm/init.c                      |   4 +
>  arch/x86/mm/kaslr.c                     | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/realmode/init.c                |   4 +
>  13 files changed, 211 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/mm/kaslr.c
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/x86/x86_64/mm.txt b/Documentation/x86/x86_64/mm.txt
> index 5aa7383..602a52d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/x86/x86_64/mm.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/x86/x86_64/mm.txt
> @@ -39,4 +39,8 @@ memory window (this size is arbitrary, it can be raised later if needed).
>  The mappings are not part of any other kernel PGD and are only available
>  during EFI runtime calls.
>
> +Note that if CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY is enabled, the direct mapping of all
> +physical memory, vmalloc/ioremap space and virtual memory map are randomized.
> +Their order is preserved but their base will be changed early at boot time.

Maybe instead of "changed", say "offset"?

> +
>  -Andi Kleen, Jul 2004
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index 0b128b4..60f33c7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -1988,6 +1988,21 @@ config PHYSICAL_ALIGN
>
>           Don't change this unless you know what you are doing.
>
> +config RANDOMIZE_MEMORY
> +       bool "Randomize the kernel memory sections"
> +       depends on X86_64
> +       depends on RANDOMIZE_BASE

Does this actually _depend_ on RANDOMIZE_BASE? It needs the
lib/kaslr.c code, but this could operate without the kernel base
address having been randomized, correct?

> +       default n

As such, maybe the default should be:

    default RANDOMIZE_BASE

> +       ---help---
> +          Randomizes the virtual address of memory sections (physical memory

How about: Randomizes the base virtual address of kernel memory sections ...

> +          mapping, vmalloc & vmemmap). This security feature mitigates exploits
> +          relying on predictable memory locations.

And "This security feature makes exploits relying on predictable
memory locations less reliable." ?

> +
> +          Base and padding between memory section is randomized. Their order is
> +          not. Entropy is generated in the same way as RANDOMIZE_BASE.

Since base would be mentioned above and padding is separate, I'd change this to:

The order of allocations remains unchanged. Entropy is generated ...

> +
> +          If unsure, say N.
> +
>  config HOTPLUG_CPU
>         bool "Support for hot-pluggable CPUs"
>         depends on SMP
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kaslr.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kaslr.h
> index 2ae1429..12c7742 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kaslr.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kaslr.h
> @@ -3,4 +3,16 @@
>
>  unsigned long kaslr_get_random_boot_long(void);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY
> +extern unsigned long page_offset_base;
> +extern unsigned long vmalloc_base;
> +extern unsigned long vmemmap_base;
> +
> +void kernel_randomize_memory(void);
> +void kaslr_trampoline_init(void);
> +#else
> +static inline void kernel_randomize_memory(void) { }
> +static inline void kaslr_trampoline_init(void) { }
> +#endif /* CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY */
> +
>  #endif
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h
> index d5c2f8b..9215e05 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h
> @@ -1,6 +1,10 @@
>  #ifndef _ASM_X86_PAGE_64_DEFS_H
>  #define _ASM_X86_PAGE_64_DEFS_H
>
> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +#include <asm/kaslr.h>
> +#endif
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
>  #define KASAN_STACK_ORDER 1
>  #else
> @@ -32,7 +36,12 @@
>   * hypervisor to fit.  Choosing 16 slots here is arbitrary, but it's
>   * what Xen requires.
>   */
> -#define __PAGE_OFFSET           _AC(0xffff880000000000, UL)
> +#define __PAGE_OFFSET_BASE      _AC(0xffff880000000000, UL)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY
> +#define __PAGE_OFFSET           page_offset_base
> +#else
> +#define __PAGE_OFFSET           __PAGE_OFFSET_BASE
> +#endif /* CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY */
>
>  #define __START_KERNEL_map     _AC(0xffffffff80000000, UL)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
> index 2ee7811..0dfec89 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ extern pmd_t level2_fixmap_pgt[512];
>  extern pmd_t level2_ident_pgt[512];
>  extern pte_t level1_fixmap_pgt[512];
>  extern pgd_t init_level4_pgt[];
> +extern pgd_t trampoline_pgd_entry;
>
>  #define swapper_pg_dir init_level4_pgt
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64_types.h
> index e6844df..d388739 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64_types.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64_types.h
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>
>  #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>  #include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <asm/kaslr.h>
>
>  /*
>   * These are used to make use of C type-checking..
> @@ -54,9 +55,17 @@ typedef struct { pteval_t pte; } pte_t;
>
>  /* See Documentation/x86/x86_64/mm.txt for a description of the memory map. */
>  #define MAXMEM          _AC(__AC(1, UL) << MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS, UL)
> -#define VMALLOC_START    _AC(0xffffc90000000000, UL)
> -#define VMALLOC_END      _AC(0xffffe8ffffffffff, UL)
> -#define VMEMMAP_START   _AC(0xffffea0000000000, UL)
> +#define VMALLOC_SIZE_TB         _AC(32, UL)
> +#define __VMALLOC_BASE  _AC(0xffffc90000000000, UL)
> +#define __VMEMMAP_BASE  _AC(0xffffea0000000000, UL)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY
> +#define VMALLOC_START   vmalloc_base
> +#define VMEMMAP_START   vmemmap_base
> +#else
> +#define VMALLOC_START   __VMALLOC_BASE
> +#define VMEMMAP_START   __VMEMMAP_BASE
> +#endif /* CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY */
> +#define VMALLOC_END      (VMALLOC_START + _AC((VMALLOC_SIZE_TB << 40) - 1, UL))
>  #define MODULES_VADDR    (__START_KERNEL_map + KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE)
>  #define MODULES_END      _AC(0xffffffffff000000, UL)
>  #define MODULES_LEN   (MODULES_END - MODULES_VADDR)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
> index 5df831e..03a2aa0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
>
>  #define pud_index(x)   (((x) >> PUD_SHIFT) & (PTRS_PER_PUD-1))
>
> -L4_PAGE_OFFSET = pgd_index(__PAGE_OFFSET)
> +L4_PAGE_OFFSET = pgd_index(__PAGE_OFFSET_BASE)
>  L4_START_KERNEL = pgd_index(__START_KERNEL_map)
>  L3_START_KERNEL = pud_index(__START_KERNEL_map)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> index c4e7b39..a261658 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@
>  #include <asm/prom.h>
>  #include <asm/microcode.h>
>  #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
> +#include <asm/kaslr.h>
>
>  /*
>   * max_low_pfn_mapped: highest direct mapped pfn under 4GB
> @@ -942,6 +943,8 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>
>         x86_init.oem.arch_setup();
>
> +       kernel_randomize_memory();
> +
>         iomem_resource.end = (1ULL << boot_cpu_data.x86_phys_bits) - 1;
>         setup_memory_map();
>         parse_setup_data();
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/Makefile b/arch/x86/mm/Makefile
> index 62c0043..96d2b84 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/Makefile
> @@ -37,4 +37,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_NUMA_EMU)                += numa_emulation.o
>
>  obj-$(CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MPX)    += mpx.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS) += pkeys.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY) += kaslr.o
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/dump_pagetables.c b/arch/x86/mm/dump_pagetables.c
> index 99bfb19..4a03f60 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/dump_pagetables.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/dump_pagetables.c
> @@ -72,9 +72,9 @@ static struct addr_marker address_markers[] = {
>         { 0, "User Space" },
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>         { 0x8000000000000000UL, "Kernel Space" },
> -       { PAGE_OFFSET,          "Low Kernel Mapping" },
> -       { VMALLOC_START,        "vmalloc() Area" },
> -       { VMEMMAP_START,        "Vmemmap" },
> +       { 0/* PAGE_OFFSET */,   "Low Kernel Mapping" },
> +       { 0/* VMALLOC_START */, "vmalloc() Area" },
> +       { 0/* VMEMMAP_START */, "Vmemmap" },
>  # ifdef CONFIG_X86_ESPFIX64
>         { ESPFIX_BASE_ADDR,     "ESPfix Area", 16 },
>  # endif
> @@ -434,6 +434,11 @@ void ptdump_walk_pgd_level_checkwx(void)
>
>  static int __init pt_dump_init(void)
>  {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> +       address_markers[LOW_KERNEL_NR].start_address = PAGE_OFFSET;
> +       address_markers[VMALLOC_START_NR].start_address = VMALLOC_START;
> +       address_markers[VMEMMAP_START_NR].start_address = VMEMMAP_START;
> +#endif
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
>         /* Not a compile-time constant on x86-32 */

I'd move this comment above you new ifdef and generalize it to something like:

    /* Various markers are not compile-time constants, so assign them here. */

>         address_markers[VMALLOC_START_NR].start_address = VMALLOC_START;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init.c b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
> index 372aad2..e490624 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>  #include <asm/proto.h>
>  #include <asm/dma.h>           /* for MAX_DMA_PFN */
>  #include <asm/microcode.h>
> +#include <asm/kaslr.h>
>
>  /*
>   * We need to define the tracepoints somewhere, and tlb.c
> @@ -590,6 +591,9 @@ void __init init_mem_mapping(void)
>         /* the ISA range is always mapped regardless of memory holes */
>         init_memory_mapping(0, ISA_END_ADDRESS);
>
> +       /* Init the trampoline page table if needed for KASLR memory */
> +       kaslr_trampoline_init();
> +
>         /*
>          * If the allocation is in bottom-up direction, we setup direct mapping
>          * in bottom-up, otherwise we setup direct mapping in top-down.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/kaslr.c b/arch/x86/mm/kaslr.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..3b330a9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/kaslr.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/smp.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/memory.h>
> +#include <linux/random.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/processor.h>
> +#include <asm/pgtable.h>
> +#include <asm/pgalloc.h>
> +#include <asm/e820.h>
> +#include <asm/init.h>
> +#include <asm/setup.h>
> +#include <asm/kaslr.h>
> +#include <asm/kasan.h>
> +
> +#include "mm_internal.h"
> +
> +/* Hold the pgd entry used on booting additional CPUs */
> +pgd_t trampoline_pgd_entry;
> +
> +#define TB_SHIFT 40
> +
> +/*
> + * Memory base and end randomization is based on different configurations.
> + * We want as much space as possible to increase entropy available.
> + */
> +static const unsigned long memory_rand_start = __PAGE_OFFSET_BASE;
> +
> +#if defined(CONFIG_KASAN)
> +static const unsigned long memory_rand_end = KASAN_SHADOW_START;
> +#elif defined(CONFIG_X86_ESPFIX64)
> +static const unsigned long memory_rand_end = ESPFIX_BASE_ADDR;
> +#elif defined(CONFIG_EFI)
> +static const unsigned long memory_rand_end = EFI_VA_START;
> +#else
> +static const unsigned long memory_rand_end = __START_KERNEL_map;
> +#endif

Is it worth adding BUILD_BUG_ON()s to verify these values stay in
decreasing size?

> +
> +/* Default values */
> +unsigned long page_offset_base = __PAGE_OFFSET_BASE;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(page_offset_base);
> +unsigned long vmalloc_base = __VMALLOC_BASE;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmalloc_base);
> +unsigned long vmemmap_base = __VMEMMAP_BASE;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmemmap_base);
> +
> +/* Describe each randomized memory sections in sequential order */
> +static struct kaslr_memory_region {
> +       unsigned long *base;
> +       unsigned short size_tb;
> +} kaslr_regions[] = {
> +       { &page_offset_base, 64/* Maximum */ },
> +       { &vmalloc_base, VMALLOC_SIZE_TB },
> +       { &vmemmap_base, 1 },
> +};

This seems to be __init_data, since it's only used in kernel_randomize_memory()?

> +
> +/* Size in Terabytes + 1 hole */
> +static inline unsigned long get_padding(struct kaslr_memory_region *region)

I think this can be marked __init also?

> +{
> +       return ((unsigned long)region->size_tb + 1) << TB_SHIFT;
> +}
> +
> +/* Initialize base and padding for each memory section randomized with KASLR */
> +void __init kernel_randomize_memory(void)
> +{
> +       size_t i;
> +       unsigned long addr = memory_rand_start;
> +       unsigned long padding, rand, mem_tb;
> +       struct rnd_state rnd_st;
> +       unsigned long remain_padding = memory_rand_end - memory_rand_start;
> +
> +       if (!kaslr_enabled())
> +               return;
> +
> +       BUG_ON(kaslr_regions[0].base != &page_offset_base);

This is statically assigned above, is this BUG_ON useful?

> +       mem_tb = ((max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) >> TB_SHIFT);
> +
> +       if (mem_tb < kaslr_regions[0].size_tb)
> +               kaslr_regions[0].size_tb = mem_tb;

Can you add a comment for this? IIUC, this is just recalculating the
max memory size available for padding based on the page shift? Under
what situations would this be changing?

> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kaslr_regions); i++)
> +               remain_padding -= get_padding(&kaslr_regions[i]);
> +
> +       prandom_seed_state(&rnd_st, kaslr_get_random_boot_long());
> +
> +       /* Position each section randomly with minimum 1 terabyte between */
> +       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kaslr_regions); i++) {
> +               padding = remain_padding / (ARRAY_SIZE(kaslr_regions) - i);
> +               prandom_bytes_state(&rnd_st, &rand, sizeof(rand));
> +               padding = (rand % (padding + 1)) & PUD_MASK;
> +               addr += padding;
> +               *kaslr_regions[i].base = addr;
> +               addr += get_padding(&kaslr_regions[i]);
> +               remain_padding -= padding;
> +       }

What happens if we run out of padding here, and doesn't this loop mean
earlier regions will have, on average, more padding? Should each
instead randomize within a one-time calculation of remaining_padding /
ARRAY_SIZE(kaslr_regions) ?

Also, to get added to the Kconfig, what is the available entropy here?
How far can each of the base addresses get offset?

> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Create PGD aligned trampoline table to allow real mode initialization
> + * of additional CPUs. Consume only 1 additonal low memory page.

Typo "additional".

> + */
> +void __meminit kaslr_trampoline_init(void)
> +{
> +       unsigned long addr, next;
> +       pgd_t *pgd;
> +       pud_t *pud_page, *tr_pud_page;
> +       int i;
> +
> +       /* If KASLR is disabled, default to the existing page table entry */
> +       if (!kaslr_enabled()) {
> +               trampoline_pgd_entry = init_level4_pgt[pgd_index(PAGE_OFFSET)];
> +               return;
> +       }
> +
> +       tr_pud_page = alloc_low_page();
> +       set_pgd(&trampoline_pgd_entry, __pgd(_PAGE_TABLE | __pa(tr_pud_page)));
> +
> +       addr = 0;
> +       pgd = pgd_offset_k((unsigned long)__va(addr));
> +       pud_page = (pud_t *) pgd_page_vaddr(*pgd);
> +
> +       for (i = pud_index(addr); i < PTRS_PER_PUD; i++, addr = next) {
> +               pud_t *pud, *tr_pud;
> +
> +               tr_pud = tr_pud_page + pud_index(addr);
> +               pud = pud_page + pud_index((unsigned long)__va(addr));
> +               next = (addr & PUD_MASK) + PUD_SIZE;
> +
> +               /* Needed to copy pte or pud alike */
> +               BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(pud_t) != sizeof(pte_t));
> +               *tr_pud = *pud;
> +       }
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/x86/realmode/init.c b/arch/x86/realmode/init.c
> index 0b7a63d..6518314 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/realmode/init.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/realmode/init.c
> @@ -84,7 +84,11 @@ void __init setup_real_mode(void)
>         *trampoline_cr4_features = __read_cr4();
>
>         trampoline_pgd = (u64 *) __va(real_mode_header->trampoline_pgd);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY
> +       trampoline_pgd[0] = trampoline_pgd_entry.pgd;
> +#else
>         trampoline_pgd[0] = init_level4_pgt[pgd_index(__PAGE_OFFSET)].pgd;
> +#endif

To avoid this ifdefs, could trampoline_pgd_entry instead be defined
outside of mm/kaslr.c and have .pgd assigned as
init_level4_pgt[pgd_index(__PAGE_OFFSET)].pgd via a static inline of
kaslr_trampoline_init() instead?

>         trampoline_pgd[511] = init_level4_pgt[511].pgd;
>  #endif
>  }
> --
> 2.8.0.rc3.226.g39d4020
>

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS & Brillo Security

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.