[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160505204345.4f936cd3ad2207c705d49c6a@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 20:43:45 +0200
From: Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>, PaX Team
<pageexec@...email.hu>, Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>, Kees
Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, David Brown
<david.brown@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] Shared library support
On Tue, 3 May 2016 23:25:27 +0200
Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com> wrote:
> > Do you need to change both the top Makefile and Makefile.clean
> > for belt-and-braces cleaning?
>
> It doesn't delete the *.so files without the hunk from the top Makefile.
> The mrproper and distclean targets remove them with this patch:
> https://github.com/ephox-gcc-plugins/gcc-plugins_linux-next/commit/f23b7eb247ccc9f1007e53313af343980dd52591
> But I think this isn't the best solution much like doing it from the top Makefile.
Do you think this patch will be good enough? In this case I can resend the patch set.
--
Emese
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
