|
Message-ID: <87wpoie6oj.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:25:16 -0500 From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Scott Bauer <sbauer@....utah.edu> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, x86@...nel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com, luto@...capital.net, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, wmealing@...hat.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, Abhiram Balasubramanian <abhiram@...utah.edu>, Scott Bauer <sbauer@...donthack.me> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] SROP Mitigation: Architecture independent code for signal cookies Scott Bauer <sbauer@....utah.edu> writes: > This patch adds a per-process secret to the task struct which > will be used during signal delivery and during a sigreturn. > Also, logic is added in signal.c to generate, place, extract, > clear and verify the signal cookie. > > Cc: Abhiram Balasubramanian <abhiram@...utah.edu> > Signed-off-by: Scott Bauer <sbauer@...donthack.me> > Signed-off-by: Scott Bauer <sbauer@....utah.edu> > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h > index 60bba7e..1828fb8 100644 > --- a/include/linux/sched.h > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h > @@ -1502,6 +1502,13 @@ struct task_struct { > unsigned long stack_canary; > #endif > /* > + * Canary value for signal frames placed on user stack. > + * This helps mitigate "Signal Return oriented program" > + * exploits in userland. > + */ > + unsigned long sig_cookie; I suspect we want this to be a per-mm attribute rather than a per-thread attribute. Otherwise you are breaking anything that uses a N-M threading model. Which I suspect means that this implementation choice breaks all go programs on linux. > + /* > * pointers to (original) parent process, youngest child, younger sibling, > * older sibling, respectively. (p->father can be replaced with > * p->real_parent->pid) Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.