[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jKArYiYi4EDw=H9Kj3DQYgD0Q51Tfwc85wCTv_TN+X03w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 21:35:40 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Cc: linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
David Drysdale <drysdale@...gle.com>, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Julien Tinnes <jln@...gle.com>, Michael Kerrisk <mtk@...7.org>, Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, "Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>, Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 03/17] selftest/seccomp: Fix the flag name SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net> wrote:
> Rename SECCOMP_FLAG_FILTER_TSYNC to SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC to match
> the UAPI.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
> Cc: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
Hah, oops. Thanks! Shuah, can you take this patch into the selftest tree?
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
-Kees
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
> index b9453b838162..9c1460f277c2 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
> @@ -1497,8 +1497,8 @@ TEST_F(TRACE_syscall, syscall_dropped)
> #define SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER 1
> #endif
>
> -#ifndef SECCOMP_FLAG_FILTER_TSYNC
> -#define SECCOMP_FLAG_FILTER_TSYNC 1
> +#ifndef SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC
> +#define SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC 1
> #endif
>
> #ifndef seccomp
> @@ -1613,7 +1613,7 @@ TEST(TSYNC_first)
> TH_LOG("Kernel does not support PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS!");
> }
>
> - ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FLAG_FILTER_TSYNC,
> + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC,
> &prog);
> ASSERT_NE(ENOSYS, errno) {
> TH_LOG("Kernel does not support seccomp syscall!");
> @@ -1831,7 +1831,7 @@ TEST_F(TSYNC, two_siblings_with_ancestor)
> self->sibling_count++;
> }
>
> - ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FLAG_FILTER_TSYNC,
> + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC,
> &self->apply_prog);
> ASSERT_EQ(0, ret) {
> TH_LOG("Could install filter on all threads!");
> @@ -1892,7 +1892,7 @@ TEST_F(TSYNC, two_siblings_with_no_filter)
> TH_LOG("Kernel does not support PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS!");
> }
>
> - ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FLAG_FILTER_TSYNC,
> + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC,
> &self->apply_prog);
> ASSERT_NE(ENOSYS, errno) {
> TH_LOG("Kernel does not support seccomp syscall!");
> @@ -1940,7 +1940,7 @@ TEST_F(TSYNC, two_siblings_with_one_divergence)
> self->sibling_count++;
> }
>
> - ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FLAG_FILTER_TSYNC,
> + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC,
> &self->apply_prog);
> ASSERT_EQ(self->sibling[0].system_tid, ret) {
> TH_LOG("Did not fail on diverged sibling.");
> @@ -1992,7 +1992,7 @@ TEST_F(TSYNC, two_siblings_not_under_filter)
> TH_LOG("Kernel does not support SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER!");
> }
>
> - ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FLAG_FILTER_TSYNC,
> + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC,
> &self->apply_prog);
> ASSERT_EQ(ret, self->sibling[0].system_tid) {
> TH_LOG("Did not fail on diverged sibling.");
> @@ -2021,7 +2021,7 @@ TEST_F(TSYNC, two_siblings_not_under_filter)
> /* Switch to the remaining sibling */
> sib = !sib;
>
> - ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FLAG_FILTER_TSYNC,
> + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC,
> &self->apply_prog);
> ASSERT_EQ(0, ret) {
> TH_LOG("Expected the remaining sibling to sync");
> @@ -2044,7 +2044,7 @@ TEST_F(TSYNC, two_siblings_not_under_filter)
> while (!kill(self->sibling[sib].system_tid, 0))
> sleep(0.1);
>
> - ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FLAG_FILTER_TSYNC,
> + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC,
> &self->apply_prog);
> ASSERT_EQ(0, ret); /* just us chickens */
> }
> --
> 2.8.0.rc3
>
--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS & Brillo Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
