[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160307223235.268a3da1c8f766474dbd3ce8@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 22:32:35 +0100
From: Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>, PaX Team
<pageexec@...email.hu>, Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com"
<kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>, Fengguang Wu
<fengguang.wu@...el.com>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, LKML
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] Shared library support
On Mon, 7 Mar 2016 13:05:16 -0800
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com> wrote:
> > Infrastructure for building independent shared library targets.
> > This effectively also reverts commit 62e2210798ed38928ab24841e8b4878a
> > (Masahiro Yamada, kbuild: drop shared library support from Makefile.host).
>
> Should this literally be a revert? If so, we'd gain the Documentation
> changes back too.
Sure, I'll do it in the next patch set.
--
Emese
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
