|
Message-Id: <20160225234542.3c02b799b9715fdbd3e9de93@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 23:45:42 +0100 From: Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com> To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Cc: linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>, PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>, Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Introduce GCC plugin infrastructure On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 16:20:40 -0800 Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote: > Running each patch through scripts/checkpatch.pl produces a number of > other warnings (I ignored all the C++isms), mostly around lines >80 > characters, function definitions (missing void), and the suggestion to I fixed only those >80 line type warnings that didn't impair the readability of the code: https://github.com/ephox-gcc-plugins/gcc-plugins_linux-next/commit/77c8e286fb -- Emese
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.