[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLVwbaGpeHuMuZOc2H3gc=_pQ=Mao6jD71r3ZJ+6eDu_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 15:37:53 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@...oraproject.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] lkdtm: Add READ_AFTER_FREE test
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com> wrote:
>> Yep, looks like the v1 patches and not the v2 patches which fix
>> a known issue with the zeroing.
>
> Ah-ha, I'll go find those and retest.
I sent out a series that was rebased. It works for me, but I want to
make sure I didn't make any glaring issues. I've also sent some fixes
to the lkdtm tests. One thing that stands out to me still is that the
READ_AFTER_FREE never shows poisoning. I remain confused, since
obviously if zeroing is working, it's being correctly poisoned...
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS & Brillo Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
