[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160218223217.301d8c7eda4f087083d97a34@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:32:17 +0100
From: Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>, PaX Team
<pageexec@...email.hu>, Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com"
<kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] Add Cyclomatic complexity GCC plugin
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:27:22 -0800
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> It's a shame there's been so much churn with gcc's plugin API. I
> wonder if it might make sense to choose 5.0 as the supported compiler
> version for this feature, just to cut down on all the ifdef noise. For
> now, let's keep it as-is, though.
I think it is important to support all gcc versions as there are a lot of distros that
use older gcc versions than 5.
I made a pass structure generator, you can see it on my github:
https://github.com/ephox-gcc-plugins/gcc-plugins_linux-next/commits/plugins
I didn't resend the patches yet because I usually wait until there are no more comments
for the previous series.
--
Emese
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
