[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2960615.8VnZpuvqp9@wuerfel>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 22:45:49 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Laura Abbott <laura@...bott.name>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lkdtm: add test for executing .rodata
On Wednesday 17 February 2016 22:44:12 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 February 2016 13:49:04 Kees Cook wrote:
> > }
> >
> > +static void __attribute__((__section__(".rodata,\"a\",@progbits#")))
> > +do_nothing_rodata(void)
> > +{
> > + return;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void do_nothing(void)
> > {
> >
>
> I think this also needs to be marked "noinline" to ensure that the
> function does not get eliminated. I've seen clang do that on
> execute_location() recently and submitted a patch for that.
Nevermind, this gets passed by reference into execute_location(),
so it's enough if that is marked noinline, but do_nothing_rodata
needs no such annotation.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
