|
Message-ID: <20160121161006.GF2510@codeblueprint.co.uk> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:10:06 +0000 From: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk> To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, will.deacon@....com, catalin.marinas@....com, mark.rutland@....com, leif.lindholm@...aro.org, keescook@...omium.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stuart.yoder@...escale.com, bhupesh.sharma@...escale.com, arnd@...db.de, marc.zyngier@....com, christoffer.dall@...aro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 19/21] efi: stub: add implementation of efi_random_alloc() On Mon, 11 Jan, at 02:19:13PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > This implements efi_random_alloc(), which allocates a chunk of memory of > a certain size at a certain alignment, and uses the random_seed argument > it receives to randomize the offset of the allocation. s/offset/address/ ? I see what you're getting at with the word "offset" but ultimately, this is a memory allocation function, and it returns an address. "offset" implies to me that the implementation allocates a larger memory chunk than is required and returns an address that is >= the start of the bigger-than-required-allocation. > This is implemented by iterating over the UEFI memory map, counting the > number of suitable slots (aligned offsets) within each region, and picking > a random number between 0 and 'number of slots - 1' to select the slot, > This should guarantee that each possible offset is chosen equally likely. > > Suggested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> > Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk> > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org> > --- > drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efistub.h | 4 + > drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/random.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 89 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efistub.h b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efistub.h > index 206b7252b9d1..7a38e29da53d 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efistub.h > +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efistub.h > @@ -46,4 +46,8 @@ void efi_get_virtmap(efi_memory_desc_t *memory_map, unsigned long map_size, > efi_status_t efi_get_random_bytes(efi_system_table_t *sys_table, > unsigned long size, u8 *out); > > +efi_status_t efi_random_alloc(efi_system_table_t *sys_table_arg, > + unsigned long size, unsigned long align_bits, > + unsigned long *addr, unsigned long random_seed); > + > #endif > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/random.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/random.c > index f539b1e31459..d4829824508c 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/random.c > +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/random.c > @@ -33,3 +33,88 @@ efi_status_t efi_get_random_bytes(efi_system_table_t *sys_table, > > return rng->get_rng(rng, NULL, size, out); > } > + > +/* > + * Return a weight for a memory entry depending on how many offsets it covers > + * that are suitably aligned and supply enough room for the allocation. > + */ > +static unsigned long get_entry_weight(efi_memory_desc_t *md, unsigned long size, > + unsigned long align_bits) > +{ > + u64 start, end; > + > + if (md->type != EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY) > + return 0; > + > + if (!(md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_WB)) > + return 0; This could do with a comment. When would EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY not have this attribute capability in the memory map? > + > + start = round_up(md->phys_addr, 1 << align_bits); > + end = round_down(md->phys_addr + md->num_pages * EFI_PAGE_SIZE - size, > + 1 << align_bits); > + > + if (start >= end) > + return 0; > + > + return (end - start) >> align_bits; > +} > + > +/* > + * The UEFI memory descriptors have a virtual address field that is only used > + * when installing the virtual mapping using SetVirtualAddressMap(). Since it > + * is unused here, we can reuse it to keep track of each descriptor's weight. > + */ > +#define MD_WEIGHT(md) ((md)->virt_addr) > + > +efi_status_t efi_random_alloc(efi_system_table_t *sys_table_arg, > + unsigned long size, unsigned long align_bits, > + unsigned long *addr, unsigned long random_seed) > +{ > + unsigned long map_size, desc_size, max_weight = 0, target; > + efi_memory_desc_t *memory_map; > + efi_status_t status = EFI_NOT_FOUND; > + int l; Could you pick a more descriptive variable name? > + > + status = efi_get_memory_map(sys_table_arg, &memory_map, &map_size, > + &desc_size, NULL, NULL); > + if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) > + return status; > + > + /* assign each entry in the memory map a weight */ > + for (l = 0; l < map_size; l += desc_size) { > + efi_memory_desc_t *md = (void *)memory_map + l; > + unsigned long weight; > + > + weight = get_entry_weight(md, size, align_bits); > + MD_WEIGHT(md) = weight; > + max_weight += weight; > + } > + > + /* find a random number between 0 and max_weight */ > + target = (max_weight * (u16)random_seed) >> 16; > + > + /* find the entry whose accumulated weight covers the target */ > + for (l = 0; l < map_size; l += desc_size) { > + efi_memory_desc_t *md = (void *)memory_map + l; > + > + if (target < MD_WEIGHT(md)) { > + unsigned long pages; > + > + *addr = round_up(md->phys_addr, 1 << align_bits) + > + (target << align_bits); > + pages = round_up(size, EFI_PAGE_SIZE) / EFI_PAGE_SIZE; > + > + status = efi_call_early(allocate_pages, > + EFI_ALLOCATE_ADDRESS, > + EFI_LOADER_DATA, > + pages, > + (efi_physical_addr_t *)addr); You're mixing data types here. efi_physical_addr_t is always 64-bits, but 'addr' is unsigned long, which is 32-bits on 32-bit platforms. This cast isn't safe. > + break; > + } > + target -= MD_WEIGHT(md); I think this needs a comment.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.