[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160120184808.3a5c6d26@pc1>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 18:48:08 +0100
From: Hanno Böck <hanno@...eck.de>
To: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: 2015 kernel CVEs
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 14:15:14 +0000
Wade Mealing <wmealing@...il.com> wrote:
> I'm all about improving process, I imagine I would have done the same
> steps. What changes to the responses would need to be made to be
> less limited ? Understand that i'm not taking this personally and
> consider this an opportunity for Red Hat Security to improve as a
> group.
Just to make this clear, I was not involved at all. I based my
statement purely on publicly available information from the advisory
that says:
"We unsuccessfully tried to contact the vendor for several months. We
never received any response on our bugtraq ticket:"
So I'm not the right person to discuss what went wrong in the process.
FWIW I tried to reach out to one of the people doing this research
(Sergej Schumilo) and hope we can make sure these issues get tackled.
--
Hanno Böck
http://hboeck.de/
mail/jabber: hanno@...eck.de
GPG: BBB51E42
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
