|
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jKAxk+7iRvB1AxETjv6_QBCTHOCn0LyLXtKeB=qoRUbJQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 15:08:04 -0800 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com> Cc: "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, "pageexec@...email.hu" <pageexec@...email.hu>, "spender@...ecurity.net" <spender@...ecurity.net> Subject: Re: Proposal for kernel self protection features On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com> wrote: > >> Can you give a status update on the constify plugin work? I'm curious >> to hear what your plans are. > > Hi, > > I'll begin with the gcc plugin infrastructure from February on. > When I'm done with it I'll continue to work on the following plugins > (I'm not sure of the order maybe I can work in parallel on them): > 1. initify > 2. structleak > 3. latent_entropy > 4. constify Sounds great, thanks! -Kees -- Kees Cook Chrome OS & Brillo Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.