|
Message-ID: <20151224003406.GA8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 00:34:07 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Laura Abbott <labbott@...oraproject.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: mm: flip priority of CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 04:11:22PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org> [151223 13:45]: > > We fixed a bunch of similar issues where code was located in the .data > > section for ease of use from assembly code. See commit b4e61537 and > > d0776aff for example. > > Thanks hey some assembly fun for the holidays :) I also need to check what > all gets relocated to SRAM here. > > In any case, seems like the $subject patch is too intrusive for v4.5 at > this point. Given Christmas and an unknown time between that and the merge window actually opening, I decided Tuesday would be the last day I take any patches into my tree - and today would be the day that I drop anything that causes problems. So, I've already dropped this, so tomorrow's linux-next should not have this change. You'll still see breakage if people enable RODATA though, but that's no different from previous kernels. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.