|
Message-ID: <CAGXu5j+LHBaZ12+zsiK+tt3R83+uTHKO_og3AJRhWP+tHDxUOA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:52:16 -0800 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org> Cc: "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com> Subject: Re: Self Introduction On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 09:49:13AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Stephen Smalley >> <stephen.smalley@...il.com> wrote: >> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 7:41 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 4:26 PM, David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 04:14:20PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: >> >>>> I'd love to see CONFIG_CPU_SW_DOMAIN_PAN into the AOSP 3.18 android kernel >> >>>> too. >> >>> >> >>> I'll put this on my list to investigate. Sadly, it looks like there >> >>> is a bit of a window of ARM CPUs where neither solution will work; >> >>> Basically the pre V8.1 64-bit. >> >> >> >> The LPAE support for PAN emulation exists in grsecurity, if someone >> >> wanted to look at how to extract it and add it to >> >> CONFIG_CPU_SW_DOMAIN_PAN (or similar). >> > >> > Are you looking for this: >> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=144308911409429&w=2 >> > >> > Haven't seen any follow up on it though... >> >> Ah yes! Thank you! >> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7250401/ >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7250391/ >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7250421/ >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7250441/ >> >> Catalin, where does this stand? > > I haven't done any further improvements to them, nor have I received any > feedback. I'll rebase them against latest kernel if anyone else is > willing to test. I had a plan to run some benchmarks and see how > performance is affected (including the CPU_SW_DOMAIN_PAN) before pushing > again for upstreaming but I haven't had the time. David, getting back to something that might good to get your help with: would you be able to test Catalin's LPAE TTBR0 PAN series on real hardware? (Are you familiar with the LKDTM tests for this[1]?) -Kees [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/663531/ specifically ACCESS_USERSPACE and EXEC_USERSPACE -- Kees Cook Chrome OS & Brillo Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.