[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <564487E2.7090603@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:36:50 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: pageexec@...email.hu, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Theodore Tso <tytso@...gle.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Subject: Re: Proposal for kernel self protection features
On 12/11/2015 13:22, PaX Team wrote:
> here's a few existing bugs of interest:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61311 (the header issue is
> also tracked in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61176#c18)
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61313
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41757 (this ship has sailed
> already i guess)
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46354
>
> i think fixing the LTO API for plugins (including backports to 4.9/5 at
> least) would be the most important and useful act for the kernel as it'd
> then help convince kernel developers of the merits of adding LTO build
> support to linux itself. IIRC, it was tried before and ran into opposition
> due to perceived lack of usefulness, something that IPA/LTO capable plugins
> could change.
Do you have any pointers on the overflows that can be introduced by the
front-end? I guess I can also look for hints in the plugin source code.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
