[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1678208981.2178058.1381152105871.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 09:21:45 -0400 (EDT)
From: Dave Anderson <anderson@...hat.com>
To: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
x86@...nel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
Aaron Durbin <adurbin@...gle.com>,
Eric Northup <digitaleric@...gle.com>, Julien Tinnes <jln@...gle.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@...gle.com>, Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>,
Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Discussion list for crash utility usage, maintenance and development" <crash-utility@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] x86, kaslr: report kernel offset on panic
----- Original Message -----
> (2013/10/03 22:47), Dave Anderson wrote:
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> (2013/10/02 18:13), HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
> >>> (2013/10/02 16:48), Kees Cook wrote:
> >> <cut>
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>> +}
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +/*
> >>>>>> * Determine if we were loaded by an EFI loader. If so, then we
> >>>>>> have also been
> >>>>>> * passed the efi memmap, systab, etc., so we should use these
> >>>>>> data structures
> >>>>>> * for initialization. Note, the efi init code path is determined
> >>>>>> by the
> >>>>>> @@ -1242,3 +1256,15 @@ void __init i386_reserve_resources(void)
> >>>>>> }
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> #endif /* CONFIG_X86_32 */
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +static struct notifier_block kernel_offset_notifier = {
> >>>>>> + .notifier_call = dump_kernel_offset
> >>>>>> +};
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +static int __init register_kernel_offset_dumper(void)
> >>>>>> +{
> >>>>>> + atomic_notifier_chain_register(&panic_notifier_list,
> >>>>>> + &kernel_offset_notifier);
> >>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>> +}
> >>>>>> +__initcall(register_kernel_offset_dumper);
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Panic notifier is not executed if kdump is enabled. Maybe, Chrome OS
> >>>>> doesn't use
> >>>>> kdump? Anyway, kdump related tools now calculate phys_base from memory
> >>>>> map
> >>>>> information passed as ELF PT_LOAD entries like below.
> >>>>
> >>>> Correct, we are not currently using kdump.
> >>>>
> >>>>> $ LANG=C readelf -l vmcore-rhel6up4
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Elf file type is CORE (Core file)
> >>>>> Entry point 0x0
> >>>>> There are 5 program headers, starting at offset 64
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Program Headers:
> >>>>> Type Offset VirtAddr PhysAddr
> >>>>> FileSiz MemSiz Flags Align
> >>>>> NOTE 0x0000000000000158 0x0000000000000000
> >>>>> 0x0000000000000000
> >>>>> 0x0000000000000b08 0x0000000000000b08 0
> >>>>> LOAD 0x0000000000000c60 0xffffffff81000000
> >>>>> 0x0000000001000000
> >>>>> 0x000000000103b000 0x000000000103b000 RWE 0
> >>>>> LOAD 0x000000000103bc60 0xffff880000001000
> >>>>> 0x0000000000001000
> >>>>> 0x000000000009cc00 0x000000000009cc00 RWE 0
> >>>>> LOAD 0x00000000010d8860 0xffff880000100000
> >>>>> 0x0000000000100000
> >>>>> 0x0000000002f00000 0x0000000002f00000 RWE 0
> >>>>> LOAD 0x0000000003fd8860 0xffff880013000000
> >>>>> 0x0000000013000000
> >>>>> 0x000000002cffd000 0x000000002cffd000 RWE 0
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Each PT_LOAD entry is assigned to virtual and physical address. In this
> >>>>> case,
> >>>>> 1st PT_LOAD entry belongs to kernel text mapping region, from which we
> >>>>> can
> >>>>> calculate phys_base value.
> >>>>
> >>>> It seems like all the information you need would still be available?
> >>>> The virtual address is there, so it should be trivial to see the
> >>>> offset, IIUC.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Partially yes. I think OK to analyze crash dump by crash utility, a
> >>> gdb-based
> >>> symbolic debugger for kernel, since phys_base absorbs kernel offset
> >>> caused by
> >>> relocation and phys_base is available in the way I explained above.
> >>>
> >>> However, the gained phys_base is not correct one, exactly phys_base +
> >>> offset_by_relocation.
> >>> When analyzing crash dump by crash utility, we use debug information
> >>> generated
> >>> during kernel build, which we install as kernel-debuginfo on RHEL for
> >>> example.
> >>> Symbols in debuginfo have statically assigned addresses at build so we
> >>> see
> >>> the statically assigned addresses during debugging and we see
> >>> phys_base + offset_by_relocation as phys_base. This would be problematic
> >>> if failure on crash dump is relevant to the relocated addresses, though I
> >>> don't
> >>> immediately come up with crash senario where relocated symbol is defitely
> >>> necessary.
> >>>
> >>> Still we can get relocated addresses if kallsyms is enabled on the
> >>> kernel,
> >>> but kallsyms and relocatable kernels are authogonal. I don't think it
> >>> natural
> >>> to rely on kallsyms. It seems natural to export relocation information
> >>> newly
> >>> as debugging information.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I was confused yesterday. As I said above, kdump related tools now don't
> >> support
> >> relocation on x86_64, phys_base only. kdump related tools think of present
> >> kernel
> >> offset as phys_base. Then, they reflect kernel offset caused by relocation
> >> in
> >> physical addresses only, not in virtual addresses. This obviously affects
> >> the
> >> tools.
> >>
> >> BTW, relocation looks more sophisticated than phys_base one. Is it
> >> possible to
> >> switch from phys_base one to relocation on x86_64? On x86, relocation is
> >> used so
> >> I guess x86_64 can work in the same way. Is there something missing?
> >> Is there what phys_base can but relocation cannot on x86_64?
> >>
> >> And, Dave, is there feature for crash utility to treat relocation now?
> >
> > Well sort of, there are couple guessing-game kludges that can be used.
> >
> > For 32-bit x86 systems configured with a CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START value
> > that is larger than its CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN value, such that the
> > vmlinux symbol values do not match their relocated virtual address
> > values, there are two options for analyzing dumpfiles:
> >
> > (1) there is a "--reloc size" command line option, presuming that
> > you know what it is.
> > (2) take a snapshot of the /proc/kallsyms file from the crashing
> > system into a file, and put it on the command line, similar
> > to putting a System.map file on the command line in order to
> > override the symbol values in the vmlinux file.
> >
> > In those cases, we have to alter all of the symbols seen in the
> > vmlinux file, and go into a backdoor into the embedded gdb module
> > to patch/modify the symbol values.
> >
> > On live x86 systems, the two options above are not necessary if
> > /proc/kallsyms exists, because its contents can be checked against
> > the vmlinux file symbol values, and the relocation calculated.
> >
> > For x86_64, the --reloc argument has never been needed. But if
> > for whatever reason the "phys_base" value cannot be determined,
> > it can be forced with the "--machdep phys_base=addr" option,
> > again presuming you know what it is.
> >
>
> Thanks for detailed explanation. So, there's already a feature in crash utility
> to address relocation!, though it's better for me to try them to check if it's
> really applicable to this feature. My concern is whether --reloc works well
> on x86_64 too, because relocation has never done on x86_64 ever, right?
Correct.
> Another concern is that in case of relocation, users need to additional information
> regarding runtime symbol information to crash utility. I want to avoid additional
> process, automation is preferable if possible.
Right. As I mentioned in the case of 32-bit x86 dumpfiles, there is no automation
available when CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START is larger than CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN. The user
either has to be aware of their values in order to calculate the --reloc argument,
or has to capture a copy of the /proc/kallsyms file on the crashed system. Typically
users/distros using kdump changed their x86 configurations to avoid having to deal
with that.
> I guess it's enough if there's runtime symbol addresses because we can get relocated
> offset value by comparing it with the compile-time symbol address contained in
> a given debuginfo file. Candidates for such symbols are the ones contained in
> VMCOREINFO note containing some symbol values for makedumpfile to refer to mm-related
> objects in kernel, which is always contained in vmcore generated by current kdump and
> also vmcores converted by makedumpfile from it. How about this idea?
But how would that differ from using an incorrect (non-matching) vmlinux file?
Dave
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
