|
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLS+71p20qB-8x_A1SJuqQN+q17-B50FqFtHc4T2YVHGA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 12:15:53 -0700 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...el.com>, Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>, Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>, Eric Northup <digitaleric@...gle.com>, Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@...curity.com>, Julien Tinnes <jln@...gle.com>, Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] x86: kaslr: select random base offset On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 2:50 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote: > On 04/26/2013 12:03 PM, Kees Cook wrote: >> + >> +static unsigned long get_random_long(void) >> +{ >> + if (has_cpuflag(X86_FEATURE_RDRAND)) { >> + unsigned long random; >> + >> + debug_putstr("KASLR using RDRAND...\n"); >> + if (rdrand(&random)) >> + return random; >> + } >> + >> + if (has_cpuflag(X86_FEATURE_TSC)) { >> + uint32_t raw; >> + unsigned long timer; >> + >> + debug_putstr("KASLR using RDTSC...\n"); >> + rdtscl(raw); >> + >> + /* Repeat the low bits of rdtsc. */ >> + timer = raw & 0xffff; >> + timer |= (timer << 16); >> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 >> + timer |= (timer << 32) | (timer << 48); >> +#endif >> + > > This seems like a very odd thing to do. If you want to scramble bits, > it would make more sense to do a multiply -- or much better, a > *circular* multiply -- with a large constant. Well, my thought here was that the entropy is only being used in a very narrow band (since it's truncated by alignment on the low end and physical memory on the high end), so I didn't want to "dilute" the already bad entropy any more. Instead, I just repeated it. If a circular multiply would serve the same purpose, I can do that. Do you have any examples of that? > >> + return timer; >> + } >> + >> + debug_putstr("KASLR found no entropy source...\n"); >> + return 0; >> +} >> > > It might be safe to assume that anything old enough to lack RDTSC > (basically a 486) will have an 8254, and reading back the 8254 counter > register. Ah, good idea. I've added this now, which seems to work if I force the TSC check to fail: #define I8254_PORT_CONTROL 0x43 #define I8254_PORT_COUNTER0 0x40 #define I8254_CMD_READBACK 0xC0 #define I8254_SELECT_COUNTER0 0x02 #define I8254_STATUS_NOTREADY 0x40 static inline u16 i8254(void) { u16 status, timer; do { outb(I8254_PORT_CONTROL, I8254_CMD_READBACK | I8254_SELECT_COUNTER0); status = inb(I8254_PORT_COUNTER0); timer = inb(I8254_PORT_COUNTER0); timer |= inb(I8254_PORT_COUNTER0) << 8; } while (status & I8254_STATUS_NOTREADY); return timer; } Thanks, -Kees -- Kees Cook Chrome OS Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.