[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5j+QHxnPLkz1+uD5=1SCBpcARbHTUKWOW6wB4LwWNhsw6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 15:01:38 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...el.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>, Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
Eric Northup <digitaleric@...gle.com>, Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@...curity.com>,
Julien Tinnes <jln@...gle.com>, Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] x86: kaslr: select memory region from e820 maps
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>> This chooses the largest contiguous RAM region for the KASLR offset
>> to live in.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>> ---
>> v2:
>> - make sure to exclude e820 regions outside the 32-bit memory range.
>
> Do you need to execlude range that is used for initrd and possible
> command_line and boot_param ?
Yeah, and while doing a stress test here, I realized there's another
problem. In the original version of this, the stack and heap are set
up after relocation. In the C port, they're set up before, so there's
even more to avoid. To illustrate... here's a CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=n
boot:
LOAD_PHYS:0x0000000001000000
input: 0x0000000001dfe24d-0x00000000023db865
output: 0x0000000001000000-0x00000000023c98c0
heap: 0x00000000023e0740-0x00000000023e8740
stack: 0x00000000023ec698
chosen: 0x0000000001000000
(stack is just cheating and reporting sp in decompress_kernel)
And a CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y and "noaslr" boot:
LOAD_PHYS:0x0000000001000000
input: 0x000000000108b25e-0x00000000016b3e96
output: 0x0000000000200000-0x00000000016a1db8
heap: 0x00000000016b9600-0x00000000016c1600
stack: 0x00000000016c5558
chosen: 0x0000000000200000
In that case, it's just so far under LOAD_PHYSICAL_START that it's
safe. But if KASLR picks an area overlapping input, heap, or stack
it's hosed. :)
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
