|
Message-ID: <516DD323.3050201@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 15:39:31 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...el.com>, Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>, Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>, Eric Northup <digitaleric@...gle.com>, Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@...curity.com>, Julien Tinnes <jln@...gle.com>, Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] x86: relocs: build separate 32/64-bit tools On 04/16/2013 03:38 PM, Kees Cook wrote: >> >> Have simple wrapper files which do: >> >> /* relocs_32.c */ >> #define ELF_BITS 32 >> #include "relocs.c" >> >> /* relocs_64.c */ >> #define ELF_BITS 64 >> #include "relocs.c" > > That's what I did in my first pass, but it seemed even worse to me. I > will go back to this. > Actually, I'm trying to see if I can refactor this into one binary. Hang on a few. -hpa
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.