[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <5165502902000078000CC022@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:42:33 +0100
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: "Borislav Petkov" <borislav.petkov@....com>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@...omium.org>,"Will Drewry" <wad@...omium.org>,
"Frederic Weisbecker" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Eric Northup" <digitaleric@...gle.com>,
"Julien Tinnes" <jln@...gle.com>,
"Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@...p.org>,
"Alex Shi" <alex.shi@...el.com>,
"Alexander Duyck" <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Marcelo Tosatti" <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
"LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Dan Rosenberg" <drosenberg@...curity.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Readonly GDT
>>> On 10.04.13 at 02:43, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> OK, thinking about the GDT here.
>
> The GDT is quite small -- 256 bytes on i386, 128 bytes on x86-64. As
> such, we probably don't want to allocate a full page to it for only
> that. This means that in order to create a readonly mapping we have to
> pack GDTs from different CPUs together in the same pages, *or* we
> tolerate that other things on the same page gets reflected in the same
> mapping.
I think a read-only GDT is incompatible with exceptions delivered
through task gates (i.e. double fault on 32-bit), so I would assume
this needs to remain a 64-bit only thing.
> However, the packing solution has the advantage of reducing address
> space consumption which matters on 32 bits: even on i386 we can easily
> burn a megabyte of address space for 4096 processors, but burning 16
> megabytes starts to hurt.
Packing would have the additional benefit of Xen not needing to
become a special case in yet another area (because pages
containing live descriptor table entries need to be read-only for
PV guests, and need to consist of only descriptor table entries).
Jan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
