[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50621D45.3090109@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:08:21 -0400
From: Corey Bryant <coreyb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Linux security workgroup usage of kernel-hardening
mailing list
On 09/25/2012 02:07 PM, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:23:14AM -0400, Corey Bryant wrote:
>> Excellent, thanks! Should we tag our subjects with anything? I was
>> thinking "lswg: ".
>
> It's your call, but I doubt that such tagging would be of much/any use.
> The topics you have listed are some of what's supposed to be discussed
> on this list, and some of the threads may proceed to other related
> topics, which are not limited to the focus of lswg (but the tags would
> remain). Similarly, postings by non-lswg folks may be relevant to you.
> I think it'd be too difficult/unreasonable to keep the separation.
>
> Alexander
>
>
>
Ok we'll go without the tag then. Thanks again!
--
Regards,
Corey Bryant
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
