[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120925040202.GA17983@openwall.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 08:02:02 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Linux security workgroup usage of kernel-hardening mailing list
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:49:35PM -0400, Corey Bryant wrote:
> The charter of the workgroup is to provide on-going security
> verification of Linux kernel subsystems in order to assist in securing
> the Linux Kernel and maintain trust and confidence in the security of
> the Linux ecosystem.
>
> This may include, but is not limited to, topics such as tooling to
> assist in securing the Linux Kernel, verification and testing of
> critical subsystems for vulnerabilities, security improvements for build
> tools, and providing guidance for maintaining subsystem security.
>
> Would it be okay if we used the kernel-hardening mailing list for
> communication?
Of course! Please do.
> If our traffic ever gets to be too much
This would be a good problem to have (well, assuming that list traffic
correlates with actual progress).
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
