|
Message-ID: <4FBBF84A.4070308@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 13:34:18 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> To: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org> CC: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Indan Zupancic <indan@....nu>, Roland McGrath <mcgrathr@...gle.com>, Eric Paris <netdev@...isplace.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, mingo@...hat.com, oleg@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, rdunlap@...otime.net, tglx@...utronix.de, luto@....edu, eparis@...hat.com, serge.hallyn@...onical.com, pmoore@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, corbet@....net, eric.dumazet@...il.com, markus@...omium.org, coreyb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, keescook@...omium.org Subject: Re: seccomp and ptrace. what is the correct order? The proposed patch seems to duplicate the functionality in <asm/syscall.h>. Those macros also try to do the right thing in the presence of compat. -hpa
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.