[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1204131414580.22039@tundra.namei.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:16:20 +1000 (EST)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-man@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, hpa@...or.com,
mingo@...hat.com, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
peterz@...radead.org, rdunlap@...otime.net, mcgrathr@...omium.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, luto@....edu, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>, djm@...drot.org,
scarybeasts@...il.com, indan@....nu, pmoore@...hat.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
markus@...omium.org, coreyb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 01/15] Add PR_{GET,SET}_NO_NEW_PRIVS to prevent execve
from granting privs
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Will Drewry wrote:
> diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> index d85b793..0b06685 100644
> --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
> +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> @@ -2016,6 +2016,13 @@ static int selinux_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
> new_tsec->sid = old_tsec->exec_sid;
> /* Reset exec SID on execve. */
> new_tsec->exec_sid = 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * Minimize confusion: if no_new_privs and a transition is
> + * explicitly requested, then fail the exec.
> + */
> + if (bprm->unsafe & LSM_UNSAFE_NO_NEW_PRIVS)
> + return -EPERM;
> } else {
> /* Check for a default transition on this program. */
> rc = security_transition_sid(old_tsec->sid, isec->sid,
> @@ -2029,7 +2036,8 @@ static int selinux_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
> ad.selinux_audit_data = &sad;
> ad.u.path = bprm->file->f_path;
>
> - if (bprm->file->f_path.mnt->mnt_flags & MNT_NOSUID)
> + if ((bprm->file->f_path.mnt->mnt_flags & MNT_NOSUID) ||
> + (bprm->unsafe & LSM_UNSAFE_NO_NEW_PRIVS))
> new_tsec->sid = old_tsec->sid;
>
> if (new_tsec->sid == old_tsec->sid) {
> --
What about dynamic transitions in SELinux ?
- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
