|
Message-ID: <CABqD9hbTWQ6uBn_jZ7WdbaAMtAcTHz3hWSer_tnAFU9iV-4GSQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:03:49 -0500 From: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Andrew Lutomirski <luto@....edu> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, davem@...emloft.net, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com, oleg@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, rdunlap@...otime.net, mcgrathr@...omium.org, tglx@...utronix.de, eparis@...hat.com, serge.hallyn@...onical.com, djm@...drot.org, scarybeasts@...il.com, indan@....nu, pmoore@...hat.com, corbet@....net, eric.dumazet@...il.com, markus@...omium.org, coreyb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, keescook@...omium.org, jmorris@...ei.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, linux-man@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 01/15] Add PR_{GET,SET}_NO_NEW_PRIVS to prevent execve from granting privs On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: > On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:01:46 -0500 > Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org> wrote: > >> From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> >> >> With this set, a lot of dangerous operations (chroot, unshare, etc) >> become a lot less dangerous because there is no possibility of >> subverting privileged binaries. > > The changelog doesn't explain the semantics of the new syscall. > There's a comment way-down-there which I guess suffices, if you hunt > for it. I'll bubble up luto's comment into the changelog when I resend the grand-unified-patchset. > And the changelog doesn't explain why this is being added. Presumably > seccomp_filter wants/needs this feature but whowhatwherewhenwhy? Spell > it all out, please. I'll try my hand at that and luto@ can yell at me if I misrepresent. Seem reasonable? > The new syscall mode will be documented in the prctl manpage. Please > cc linux-man@...r.kernel.org and work with Michael on getting this > done? I'll add linux-man to the patch series since this applies to both no_new_privs and seccomp filter. Thanks! >> >> ... >>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.