|
Message-ID: <1334054074.3126.75.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:34:34 +0200 From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> To: Indan Zupancic <indan@....nu> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, davem@...emloft.net, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com, oleg@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, rdunlap@...otime.net, mcgrathr@...omium.org, tglx@...utronix.de, luto@....edu, eparis@...hat.com, serge.hallyn@...onical.com, djm@...drot.org, scarybeasts@...il.com, pmoore@...hat.com, corbet@....net, markus@...omium.org, coreyb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, keescook@...omium.org, jmorris@...ei.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 08/15] seccomp: add system call filtering using BPF On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 04:22 +1000, Indan Zupancic wrote: > On Sat, April 7, 2012 06:23, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > I think this gives userspace an easy way of causing page allocation > > failure warnings, by permitting large kmalloc() attempts. Add > > __GFP_NOWARN? > > Max is 32kb. sk_attach_filter() in net/core/filter.c is worse, > it allocates up to 512kb before even checking the length. > I dont think so. sk_attach_filter() uses sk_malloc() and it does a check. # cat /proc/sys/net/core/optmem_max 20480 Of course you can change the limit on your machine.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.