Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:53:06 -0500
From: Will Drewry <>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 00/13] seccomp_filter: syscall filtering using BPF

On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 2:36 PM, H. Peter Anvin <> wrote:
> On 03/14/2012 08:11 PM, Will Drewry wrote:
>> Please see prior revisions of this patch series for a high
>> level blurb.
>> This revision makes a number of refinements and tweaks. The biggest
>> change is a slight renumbering of the return codes which will break
>> existing code using this patch series.
>> I believe this patch is in good shape, and I don't see the need for
>> any more API changes at this point.  I plan to start using this revision
>> more extensively, and I'd certainly appreciate any testing.
>> Thanks!
>> will
> x86 portions:
> Reviewed-by: H. Peter Anvin <>


> What is the preferred way to push this upstream?  (Presumably for 3.5 at
> this point, but we should get it into -next as soon as possible after
> the merge window.)

A repost when rc1 has been cut is what's been suggested to me.

Additionally, two tweaks have been pointed out off list (documentation
cruft and lack if #ifdef for asm/syscall.h), which I have fixed in my
local and github tree but haven't yet reposted here.  I was planning
on just posting v17 when rc1 is cut (unless I've blithely missed it
already) and then trying to pester everyone and anyone who can merge.

Maybe someone more authoritative than me will answer though.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.