|
Message-ID: <1331658828.4449.16.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:13:48 -0700 From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> To: Indan Zupancic <indan@....nu> Cc: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, davem@...emloft.net, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com, oleg@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, rdunlap@...otime.net, mcgrathr@...omium.org, tglx@...utronix.de, luto@....edu, eparis@...hat.com, serge.hallyn@...onical.com, djm@...drot.org, scarybeasts@...il.com, pmoore@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, corbet@....net, markus@...omium.org, coreyb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, keescook@...omium.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 01/13] sk_run_filter: add BPF_S_ANC_SECCOMP_LD_W On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 11:04 +0100, Indan Zupancic wrote: > Hello, > > I made a quick pseudo-patch for BPF JIT support. As far as I can tell, > the actual code itself is very simple, just: > > - bpf_jit_compile(fp); > + jit = bpf_jit_compile(fp->insns, fp->len, 1); > + if (jit) { > + fp->bpf_func = jit; > + /* Free unused insns memory */ > + newfp = krealloc(fp, sizeof(*fp), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (newfp) > + fp = newfp; > + } > > old_fp = rcu_dereference_protected(sk->sk_filter, > sock_owned_by_user(sk)); Dont mix unrelated changes in a single patch. Current krealloc() doesnt alloc a new area if the current one is bigger than 'new_size', but this might change in next kernel versions. So this part of your patch does nothing. If it did, this kind of 'optimization' can actually be not good, because sizeof(*fp) is small enough (less than half cache line size) to trigger a possible false sharing issue. (other part of the cache line could be used to hold a often dirtied object)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.