[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120302141038.aaafc42b59ac7cf95d3553ed@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:10:38 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, davem@...emloft.net,
hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com, oleg@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
rdunlap@...otime.net, mcgrathr@...omium.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
luto@....edu, eparis@...hat.com, serge.hallyn@...onical.com,
djm@...drot.org, scarybeasts@...il.com, indan@....nu, pmoore@...hat.com,
corbet@....net, eric.dumazet@...il.com, markus@...omium.org,
coreyb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 01/13] sk_run_filter: add support for custom
load_pointer
Hi Kees,
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 16:57:49 -0800 Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, yes, it does -- there were both ptrace changes and prctl changes.
>
> And at least the ptrace changes are, IIRC, in -mm, which has no tree.
> :P Given that, what's the best thing for me to do for this to be easy
> for you to pull?
Does this set of patches *depend* on functionality provided by those, or
just produce conflicts against the other changes? If it is just
conflicts, then base your tree on Linus and I and (he when it comes to
it) can fix the conflicts as needed (with some hints if you think it is a
good idea i.e. is the conflicts are particularly complex).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
