|
Message-ID: <4F3DAE5D.3080000@zytor.com> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:33:17 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> To: Indan Zupancic <indan@....nu> CC: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, davem@...emloft.net, mingo@...hat.com, oleg@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, rdunlap@...otime.net, mcgrathr@...omium.org, tglx@...utronix.de, luto@....edu, eparis@...hat.com, serge.hallyn@...onical.com, djm@...drot.org, scarybeasts@...il.com, pmoore@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, corbet@....net, eric.dumazet@...il.com, markus@...omium.org, keescook@...omium.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/8] seccomp: add system call filtering using BPF On 02/16/2012 04:48 PM, Indan Zupancic wrote: > On Thu, February 16, 2012 22:17, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > I would go for something like: > > struct seccomp_data { > int nr; > __u32 arg_low[6]; > __u32 arg_high[6]; > __u32 instruction_pointer_low; > __u32 instruction_pointer_high; > __u32 __reserved[3]; > }; > Uh, that is the absolutely WORST way to do it - not only are you creating two fields, they're not even adjacent. > (Not sure what use the IP is because that doesn't tell anything about how > the system call instruction was reached.) > > The only way to avoid splitting args is to add 64-bit support to BPF. > That is probably the best way forwards, but would require breaking the > BPF ABI by either adding a 64-bit version directly or adding extra > instructions. Or the compiler or whatever generates the BPF code just is going to have to generate two instructions -- just like we always have to handle [u]int64_t on 32-bit platforms. There is no difference here. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.