[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120211203309.GA18093@albatros>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:33:09 +0400
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linun-security-module@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/8] seccomp: Add SECCOMP_RET_TRAP
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 12:19 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 00:03 +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 13:30 -0600, Will Drewry wrote:
> > > (As a side note, I realize the CC list has ballooned. In the next
> > > rev, I'll pare it down to active participants and the appropriate
> > > lists and not just the get_maintainers.pl output!)
> > Add kernel-hardening to CC and remove me and Kees ;)
>
> Should that list be added to MAINTAINERS or
> Documentation/ somewhere?
Probably yes, but we haven't fully agreed on what are the formal
criterias of k-h posting. Currently these are either discussion of
not-yet-merged security features or general security problems of Linux.
I guess we should more clearly state the role of k-h to place k-h in
MAINTAINERS.
Thanks,
--
Vasiliy Kulikov
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
